Edited By griphook on 08/03/05 20:45
Wouldnt it be better to not focus on STR and focus on Charisma since its a holy kind of build? Perhaps even not do all the Con and do Char aswell? The CON is very important to have at least 21 for teh epic damage reduction feats. I went with STR over CHA mostly because I have a CHA based build and foundd STR based is better because it's always there where as CHA based boosts are only around for a few rounds. Also I found this route I had very acceptable damage averages. About the only thing I would really change is the weapon used. If you look in the build index under my name I have a bard/pm/BG that is CHA based and abuses those abilities. Playing between the two I would say this is the superior of the two.Quote: Posted 12/09/04 23:43:14 (GMT) -- Emrill
About the only thing I would really change is the weapon used.
Quote: Posted 07/11/10 09:36 (GMT) -- KidMiracleman
I noticed no divine shield or might why is that?
Edited By Maximillian Kane on 07/11/10 14:19
paladin = STYLE! At least back in 2004!Quote: Posted 07/11/10 21:45 (GMT) -- avado
paladin = STYLE! At least back in 2004!
While fighter gives feats, the paladin has a few more nicenessess! Immune to fear for one, which is often overlooked. The save boosts with cha gear. And, in this build, the synergy with COT.
I cannot, nor would i ever speak for Em, alas i havent seen him in a LOOONNNNGG time. Needless to say, or maybe it is needed!, Anuis and I were discussing an idea just before he put out his build a few weeks ago. A build is only ONE idea! It isnt, nor should it EVER be considered a static entity (though, there are a few PERFECT builds, maybe 4 in the entire guild). If you want fighter, sub it in!
In the future, while it is perfectly cool to ask on builds as old as this guy, asking "why take pal" is something that the original poster could only truly answer 100% (everyone else is speculating), and the odds of Em being around are slim. But who knows.