Edited By Kail Pendragon on 10/14/07 13:44
well demi liches are hard for anybody without magical equipment because of the DR, dexters just cant hit hard enough to overcome it where as a Pal/cot type char can pretty much smite once and kill it.Edited By Khandahr on 05/13/05 10:11
You can knock down anything on a roll of 20, only a high discipline prevents this. If its knocked down you are sneak attacking.Quote: Posted 05/13/05 10:09:42 (GMT) -- Khandahr
Just a few questions. I'm not a good builder, so I hope these questions are of relevance/make sense:
I'm not sure I see the benefit of the knockdown, would expertise+imp expertise not be better for this build? Reason being; is that with your bab you're not going to be knocking down the things that _can_ get through your ac (I would think).
You lose weapon specialisation. The worst thing about dex builds are low damage. Epic Weapon Specialisation is like having +3 AB and equivalent of +12 STR for damage before taking into account items.Quote:
Second; maybe swapping a grt dex for epic focus: umd would help a little on the equipment side (a lot of the better 'epic' kit will need 50 or better umd to use; epic f:umd will give you about 52 with your lower cha).
Third; would this not work better with an elf using COT instead of fighter? Elf can dualwield shortswords with same penalty as halfling+daggers, and there would be no xp penalty (I know halfling would have none anyway as rogue is favoured, just thinking out loud on elf options) It would be taken later; sure, but you could still fit the same feats (I think?) and get the same benefits as you would for fighter wouldn't you?
Quote: Posted 05/13/05 11:21:14 (GMT) -- Khandahr
That's clear enough for me .
My point on knockdown was; if you're waiting for 20's to knockdown then you're going to miss a lot.. even if you get 20 once every 6 or 7 rounds; that's 5 or 6 rounds you've reduced your chances to hit. Instead; you could go into Improved expertise and with epic dodge + sc5, even if your opponent gets two 20's in a round, you will take no damage on one; and get 50% chance of the other missing.
Just trying to get my head around knockdown with a low-ab build
Edited By Khandahr on 05/13/05 13:05
Quote: Posted 05/13/05 13:03:39 (GMT) -- Khandahr
I might be kinda off on this one so appologies if I am. I do like the build.. don't get me wrong, I think it's pretty cool to get in epc dgde; sc5 and reasonable ab to add to that.
But, given that a str-based fighter - or str-based melee I should say (the kind of enemy you need to knockdown to kill or get killed quick) would have easily 65 naked discipline, if I calc it right.
[43 ranks + 10 (epic focus) + 12 (str bonus at 34str) = 65]
Your best attack roll (excluding natural 20) for that kind of naked discipline is around 6 short of that (granted improved kd gives +4 due to size improvement, that is factored into the roll). That's just a fighter with decent discipline; not mentioning the high ac builds which seem common on PvP servers.
However; take into account a high-bab melee now that can easily get 60/55/50/45; and expertise becomes a need.
+12 str pushes to 60; mundane focus weapon. Note that this could be pushed by an extra 1 by starting at str or 20. If you look at the image attached; this can be improved to 42 using rdd; so add to that another +3; for a total of 64, ising unenhanced equipment.Quote: from a previous post on the general forum
str based.
Half-orc Fighter 12/Weapon Master 28
30 BAB
+13 36 str (19 base +10 attribute bonuses +7 feats)
+1 weapon focus
+2 epic weapon focus
+1 epic prowess
+1 superior weapon focus
+6 epic superior weapon focus
54 total
Edited By Khandahr on 05/13/05 15:30
Quote: Posted 05/13/05 15:21:24 (GMT) -- Khandahr
Here is one from the PW I play on. It uses a +15 mace; so remove +15 from it automatically. This character is active on one of the PW's I play frequently.
Click Here
Another one; that is from a post by Mithradates:+12 str pushes to 60; mundane focus weapon. Note that this could be pushed by an extra 1 by starting at str or 20. If you look at the image attached; this can be improved to 42 using rdd; so add to that another +3; for a total of 64, ising unenhanced equipment.Quote: from a previous post on the general forum
str based.
Half-orc Fighter 12/Weapon Master 28
30 BAB
+13 36 str (19 base +10 attribute bonuses +7 feats)
+1 weapon focus
+2 epic weapon focus
+1 epic prowess
+1 superior weapon focus
+6 epic superior weapon focus
54 total
Agreed these are highly extreme examples. But; if these are possible, it is highly likely to acheive over 60ab with a well stocked character.
My (badly illustrated I'll agree) point, was that survival is the key to the build; imo. I'll agree firsthand that I might be wrong on it though.
Edited By Khandahr on 05/13/05 16:24
Quote: Posted 05/13/05 16:06:53 (GMT) -- grizzled_dwarflordQuote: Posted 05/13/05 15:21:24 (GMT) -- Khandahr
Here is one from the PW I play on. It uses a +15 mace; so remove +15 from it automatically. This character is active on one of the PW's I play frequently.
Click Here
Another one; that is from a post by Mithradates:+12 str pushes to 60; mundane focus weapon. Note that this could be pushed by an extra 1 by starting at str or 20. If you look at the image attached; this can be improved to 42 using rdd; so add to that another +3; for a total of 64, ising unenhanced equipment.Quote: from a previous post on the general forum
str based.
Half-orc Fighter 12/Weapon Master 28
30 BAB
+13 36 str (19 base +10 attribute bonuses +7 feats)
+1 weapon focus
+2 epic weapon focus
+1 epic prowess
+1 superior weapon focus
+6 epic superior weapon focus
54 total
Agreed these are highly extreme examples. But; if these are possible, it is highly likely to acheive over 60ab with a well stocked character.
My (badly illustrated I'll agree) point, was that survival is the key to the build; imo. I'll agree firsthand that I might be wrong on it though.
What is Superior Epic Weapon Focus, and why is it +6? Yeah, this guy would suck. Naked64AB vs Naked40AC not going to cut it. But, this guy isn't supposed to take melee types on face-to-face. That's just foolish.