Edited By griphook on 12/26/05 15:23
Is there a reason for not going Druid 28/CoT 10/<something-not-Monk> 2?Edited By FinneousPJ on 12/12/05 14:16
It should be noted that the moment you take monk you link your stunning fists uses per day to your monk lvl. That's the only reason not to take monk IMO and compared to free improved unarmed attack, monk's progression for your unarmed forms, cleave, evasion and +13 AC (+19 w/WIS capped) that just one lvl of monk would give (when the 11th lvl of CoT gives just +2HP)it's a veeery weak reason...Quote: Posted 12/12/05 14:14:22 (GMT) -- FinneousPJ
Is there a reason for not going Druid 28/CoT 10/<something-not-Monk> 2?
I question the usefulness of one lone Epic Energy Resistance... pick up WF & EWF on Unarmed Strike for god's sake! And an Epic Spell Focus would be nice, too.
Actually I'd change the spell focus to Conjuration, but that's just a matter of preference. Conjuration has Grease, Stonehold and Storm of Vengeance, all of which disable your opponents (Storm inflicts damage aswell), and should be used in conjuction with the ultimate no-SR spell, Creeping Doom.
Though there is - in my opinion - room for some polishing, it's a nice concept, good job.
EDIT: as it is, you've a 100% chance to penetrate 32 SR and going with 28 Druid reduces this to a mere 95%. The only downside, I'd say.
As for the something-not-Monk, Druid/CoT/Barbarian sounds cool
Euh, I'd say the Epic Spell Focus is still better.Quote: dmuzzy
The Epic Energy Resistance was only taken because there wasn't much left from the Druid Bonus feat list. You could substitute an Epic Spell instead; perhaps Hellball or Greater Ruin (pity no Epic Warding).
Edited By FinneousPJ on 12/12/05 15:46
Quote: Posted 12/12/05 15:14:36 (GMT) -- dmuzzy
I had thought about taking an epic spell focus, but in epic levels the spells rarely failed.
The Epic Energy Resistance was only taken because there wasn't much left from the Druid Bonus feat list. You could substitute an Epic Spell instead; perhaps Hellball or Greater Ruin (pity no Epic Warding).
Quote:
For some reason, I was thinking that WF and EWF Unarmed Combat didn't work with the Druid's Shapes. I thought that someone had said that they showed up in the character sheet but didn't actually make it into the actual combat rolls. If I am incorrect, then yes, I would want to work those in.
Now you start sounding reasonableQuote:
Of course at that point I would probably just say "damn the torpedoes, I'm taking some Monk!!"
Quote: Posted 12/12/05 15:31:46 (GMT) -- FinneousPJEuh, I'd say the Epic Spell Focus is still better.Quote: dmuzzy
The Epic Energy Resistance was only taken because there wasn't much left from the Druid Bonus feat list. You could substitute an Epic Spell instead; perhaps Hellball or Greater Ruin (pity no Epic Warding).
As for the (E)WF issue, Xylophone posted a Druid 28/Monk 10/SD 2 build not long ago, which had those feats and he had listed the ABs for each elemental form plus Dragon shape so I expect those feats do make a difference.
EDIT: the extremely high Wisdom isn't actually as good as it sounds like. I'm not sure if you thought about this but if you drop the Epic Energy Resistance for Epic Spell Focus: X and two Wisdom for Greater Spell Focus: Y you effectively gain +1 in X DCs and +3 in Y DCs while losing 1 point in others. Losing another two Wisdom you gain Epic Spell Focus in Y aswell, making X DCs the same they're now and Y DCs 4 points higher, and you gain an extra epic feat on top of that. Something to think about
at the moment:
X: 10 +Z +13 +4 = 27 +Z
Y: 10 +Z +13 = 23 +Z
other: 10 +Z +13 = 23 +Z
1st case:
X: 10 +Z +12 +6 = 28 +Z
Y: 10 +Z +12 +4 = 26 +Z
other: 10 +Z +12 = 22 +Z
2nd case:
X: 10 +Z +11 +6 = 27 +Z
Y: 10 +Z +11 +6 = 27 +Z
other: 10 +Z +11 = 21 +Z
Z is the spell level
plus one extra feat (EWF: Unarmed )
Edited By FinneousPJ on 12/12/05 16:08