Quote: Posted 02/21/07 22:40 (GMT) -- grizzled_dwarflord
I've noticed that there really hasn't been a Moderator presence on any of the Epic Build Boards. Have they all left for NWN2? Has the time finally come where I stand alone in this graveyard of broken builds, and the Sepulchre of Hero Kings and Warrior Queens?
A chill wind tugs at my cloak, and I draw my hood tighter, and toil on through the lonely night
Edited By I...Samphus on 02/22/07 10:58
Actually I come here every day. Worry not, my children!Quote: Posted 02/22/07 18:44 (GMT) -- grizzled_dwarflord
Ah, well, that's 6 of us then. Good to know. Thanks, Finn and Anuis. I don't suppose anyone has ever heard what happened to Griphook?
Edited By FinneousPJ on 02/22/07 19:15
I'm not a moderator but I still check to see if anything has been posted about any of my builds. I'm real busy though.Quote: Posted 02/22/07 14:56 (GMT) -- Bromium
Thanks pappa FinneousPJ, now go fix that butchered Monk Attack table on the wiki!
Quote: Posted 02/22/07 21:36 (GMT) -- Bromium
Ack, brain damage moment, I got you mixed up with Kail Pendragon.
mia culpa
Quote:It's mea culpa btw. Not that I were the praying type but anyway.Quote: mia culpa
Quote: Posted 02/24/07 01:45 (GMT) -- Thaxll'ssylliaQuote:It's mea culpa btw. Not that I were the praying type but anyway.Quote: mia culpa
Heh heh, don't be too hasty to moderate everything Finn, because it's actually perfectly well written (well, ortografically it is, syntaxis is kind of wrong), don't try to be a spanish language moderator, leave that for spanish-talking dudes
Quote: Posted 02/24/07 01:45 (GMT) -- Thaxll'ssyllia
in the real world you can't just fix everything with an axe
Quote: Posted 02/24/07 11:36 (GMT) -- FinneousPJQuote: Posted 02/24/07 01:45 (GMT) -- Thaxll'ssylliaQuote:It's mea culpa btw. Not that I were the praying type but anyway.Quote: mia culpa
Heh heh, don't be too hasty to moderate everything Finn, because it's actually perfectly well written (well, ortografically it is, syntaxis is kind of wrong), don't try to be a spanish language moderator, leave that for spanish-talking dudes
Uh, spanish? I was thinking latin.
Quote: Posted 02/24/07 14:26 (GMT) -- Thaxll'ssylliaQuote: Posted 02/24/07 11:36 (GMT) -- FinneousPJ
Uh, spanish? I was thinking latin.
I could be wrong dechiphering Bromium, but "mia culpa" is a direct word translation of "my fault", although the sentence is not completely well expressed, it works like it anyway, it's quite understandable for him to say it was his fault, I think I've read Bromium write a bit of spanish before... Latin huh? now, I would know nothing about it, not what it would mean to say "mea culpa"
Quote: Posted 02/24/07 23:08 (GMT) -- Kaliban99
Present, except for when I'm in absentia.
Edited By Thaxll'ssyllia on 02/25/07 01:02
I'm still here, GD, though I am probably the furthest from your mind and you probably was not hoping for my...yeah.Quote: Posted 05/22/07 22:13 (GMT) -- WebShaman
But I visit this Guild and Forum quite regularly - for the PRC builds, of course!
Edited By TyrTemplar on 05/30/07 05:21
Quote: Posted 02/24/07 14:26 (GMT) -- Thaxll'ssyllia
I could be wrong dechiphering Bromium, but "mia culpa" is a direct word translation of "my fault", although the sentence is not completely well expressed, it works like it anyway, it's quite understandable for him to say it was his fault, I think I've read Bromium write a bit of spanish before... Latin huh? now, I would know nothing about it, not what it would mean to say "mea culpa"
Quote:
Latin term, meaning: the thing itself speaks (trans., the thing speaks for itself at least it does legally speaking, in the law of torts (to injure or more accurately "wrong") to mean obv. negligence (i.e., patient finds after surgery a pair of scissors are inside of him, which obviously were left there from the doctor who performed the operation --as in, not born like that, nor put there by hair stylist or gardener since, assuming only the one surgery, res ipsa loquitur , and no need to go through the whole routine etc. of the surgeon, for it is enough to show a surgery performed by that doctor on the said patient. Once est., then, respondeat superior kicks in (meaning, let the master answer (or that employers are responsible for employees wh., in the surgery e.g. means the hospital must answer (be responsible) for the res (negl. thing) of its employee (doctor); as it relates (loosely) to NWN: assuming you're on a jaunt and attacked by an angry warrior, who lands a hit on you w. his/her sword and you die instantly, ... in this case, the res is of course dev crit (anyone think differently? Like, maybe, not enough HPs ), but there wld be no negl. for the res ipsa doctrine to apply since, by signing on to the world, you consented to being dev.critted (or were yourself negl. at least contributorily so, since you went out w. either too little fort or too few hps, or both). Ah, this result unless on signing it was a case of non est factum, a principle of contract law meaning, "it was not your deed" (i.e., signed while passing out after drinking the Dwarve’s ale, not realizing what you were signing or that you even held a pen A difficult claim to make, though; better to claim void ab initio (literally, not binding from the beginning/void by mistake), ie., if the PW mistakenly told you that devcrit was banned, when in fact it was not
Ah, but this is obiter dicta (words in passing, being "by the way" remarks (comments stated by courts which put the actual decision into context, or which explore other areas of the opinion, to shed light on the past or how a decision may affect something in future, but which dictum are not binding as these are only side remarks, being interesting (and perhaps persuasive down the road when and if such future case should appear before the courts) but are not part the ratio decidendi (actual legal reasoning to support the judgment of the court, in the instant case based on the facts raised by the parties before it: only the ratio is legally binding, on the basis of stare decisis ("to stand by things decided", the crux of the common law system. It means that when another case involving the same facts come before it (assuming the same or a lesser level of court) for a decision, the ratio of the prior case from the (same or higher level of) court will be applied/binding to the same facts, unless and until changed by a court higher up in the legal-food chain (i.e., on an appeal, for example to the Supreme Court, being the highest court, whose decisions are final and binding on all). This, unless you're in a civil law system (in which case, this might as well be greek
Edited By TyrTemplar on 05/30/07 18:12
Quote: Posted 05/30/07 17:48 (GMT) -- TyrTemplar
(heh, see what a law school education will get you? A great latin dictionary, ... and Finn, you thought latin was dead? ER, mea culpa (“my bad”) …
Quote: p.s. Bromium, Thax: sounds better in Spanish (or French) though, if you can master those "r" rolls
Edited By TyrTemplar on 05/30/07 21:18
Quote: If you don't know what an R roll is then you don't speak French properly
Quote: Thax, the r? That french 'r' -- hmmm, supposedly one of the more difficult linguistic pron. for an English speaker to make ...
Quote: As for the Spanish R, completely different again (from the tip of the tongue apparently, depending on where it is in the sentence, and either way escapes me as to how to expl. that one, sounding nothing remotely like an ‘r’ in English (more like a ddddd, as in a really fast drum beat, but maybe that’s just me
Edited By Thaxll'ssyllia on 05/30/07 22:03
In Norway the "r"s are pronounced very differently from standard English. Either like the Glasgow r, that's about 2/3rds of Norway, or 1/3rd that has the rolling r just like France. Not being able to pronounce the standard r (Glasgow) is the most common speech impediment in Norway. It's a tough sound for our new countrymen to master too.Quote: Posted 06/09/07 16:29 (GMT) -- Thaxll'ssyllia
Aren't we way offtopic? I know I went along into it, but I guess this is too much already.